Оцінка ефективності моделей управління в закладах вищої освіти

Serhii Shabelnyk

doi:10.51599/is.2024.08.04.09

Authors

Serhii Shabelnyk Poltava State Agrarian University https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4649-2645

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51599/is.2024.08.04.09

Keywords:

efficiency, models, management, universities, educational activities, innovation, human resources potential, integral indicator.

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of the study is to develop and test an integral indicator of the efficiency of management of higher education institutions (HEIs) in Ukraine based on multi-criteria analysis using the TOPSIS method.

Results. Assessment and analysis of management efficiency in Ukrainian HEIs allowed to determine the dynamics of development of various types of universities during 2014–2023 and key trends in the higher education system. The results of the study indicate a significant impact of the efficiency of management models on the quality of functioning of HEIs. Key factors contributing to successful management are identified, including strategic planning, adaptability to changes and the implementation of innovative approaches. The need to integrate modern technologies and digital tools into the management system is confirmed. Prospects for the development of management models aimed at increasing the competitiveness and sustainability of HEIs in conditions of dynamic changes are outlined.

Scientific novelty. The novelty of the presented research lies in the definition and theoretical substantiation of modern approaches to the management of HEIs in conditions of dynamic changes. A conceptual model is proposed that integrates strategic planning, digital transformation and adaptive management mechanisms. For the first time, a comprehensive analysis of the impact of innovative technologies on the efficiency of management processes in the field of education has been carried out. The obtained results expand theoretical ideas about the modernisation of management systems and can serve as the basis for practical recommendations for increasing the competitiveness of HEIs.

Practical value. The practical value of the study lies in the possibility of applying its results to improve the efficiency of management of modern HEIs. The proposed approaches contribute to the improvement of strategic planning, optimisation of management processes and the introduction of innovative technologies, which allows increasing the competitiveness and adaptability of educational institutions. The use of the developed recommendations will contribute to improving the quality of educational services, increasing the level of satisfaction of higher education applicants and teachers, as well as creating favourable conditions for the development of a modern educational ecosystem.

References

TOPSIS method for Multiple-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM). ULR: https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/topsis-method-for-multiple-criteria-decision-making-mcdm.

Gryshchenko I., Ganushchak-Efimenko L., Shcherbak V. Nifatova О. et al. Making use of competitive advantages of a university education innovation cluster in the educational services market. European Journal of Sustainable Development. 2021. Vol. 10. No. 2. Pp. 336–348. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2021.v10n2p336.

Prokopenko O., Martyn O., Bilyk O., Vivcharuk O. et al. Models of state clusterisation management, marketing and labour market management in conditions of globalization, risk of bankruptcy and services market development. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security. 2021. Vol. 21. No. 12. Pp. 228–234. https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2021.21.12.34.

Долгіх Я. В. Оцінка та аналіз методом DEA ефективності відтворення наукових кадрів закладів вищої освіти регіонів України. Економіка і управління. 2020. № 3. С. 118–126. https://doi.org/10.36919/2312-7812.3.2020.118.

Черненко О. Порівняльний аналіз моделей систем управління якістю вищої освіти. Український педагогічний журнал. 2024. № 2. С. 79–89. https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2024-2-79-89.

Грушецький Б. В., Акімов О. О. Реалізація механізмів державного управління розвитком вищої освіти в Україні. Економіка, управління та адміністрування. 2023. № 3(105). С. 103–109. https://doi.org/10.26642/ema-2023-3(105)-103-109.

Самойленко О. В., Демченко Н. М., Філоненко О. С. Особливості формування ефективної кадрової політики закладу освіти. Наукові записки. Серія «Психолого-педагогічні науки» (Ніжинський державний університет імені Миколи Гоголя). 2023. № 3. С. 110–118. https://doi.org/10.31654/2663-4902-2023-РР-3-110-118.

Popelo O., Kholiavko N., Safonov Y., Shaposhnykov K. et al. Global trends of universities digitalization under the sustainable development concept. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development. 2024. Vol. 46(4). Pp. 473–481. https://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2024.44.

Shaposhnykov K., Shaposhnykova I., Tanashchuk K., Filippov V. et al. Competitiveness of higher education in the context of ensuring sustainable development of the state. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development. 2022. Vol. 44. No. 3. Pp. 280–287. https://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2022.29.

Hanaysha J. R., Shriedeh F. B., In’airat M. Impact of classroom environment, teacher competency, information and communication technology resources, and university facilities on student engagement and academic performance. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights. 2023. Vol. 3(2). 100188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2023.100188.

Остенда А., Самойленко О., Івашев Є. Моделі оцінки рівня інтернаціоналізації вищої освіти. Професійна педагогіка. 2022. № 1(24). С. 306–313. https://doi.org/10.32835/2707-3092.2022.24.306-313.

Марчук А. Якість вищої освіти в надзвичайних умовах: освітні втрати й дисфункції цифровізації вищої освіти та дистанційного навчання. Соціально-економічні відносини в цифровому суспільстві. 2023. № 1(47). С. 80–89. https://doi.org/10.55643/ser.1.47.2023.482.

Mykhailichenko M., Lozhachevska O., Smagin V., Krasnoshtan O. et al. Competitive strategies of personnel management in business processes of agricultural enterprises focused on digitalization. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development. 2021. Vol. 43. No. 3. Pp. 403–414. https://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2021.37.

Крупка М. І., Гринькевич О. С., Сас С. П. Економічна ефективність університетів України у контексті інноваційності фінансового менеджменту. Фінансово-кредитна діяльність: проблеми теорії і практики. 2021. Вип. 1(32). C. 470–481. https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v1i32.200659.

Черненко О. Порівняльний аналіз моделей систем управління якістю вищої освіти. Український педагогічний журнал. 2024. № 2. С. 79–89. https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2024-2-79-89.

Тарасенко О. Інструментарій оцінювання ефективності ЗВО в системі стратегічного управління. Економіка та суспільство. 2024. № 64. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-64-86.

Chaudhry I. S., Sarwary S. A. M., El Refae G. A., Chabchoub H. Time to revisit existing student’s performance evaluation approach in higher education sector in a new era of ChatGPT – a case study. Cogent Education. 2023. Vol. 10. Is. 1. 2210461. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2210461.

Гришина Ю., Пижова М. Управління закладом вищої освіти: пошук ефективної моделі. Економіка і регіон. 2022. № 2(85). С. 6–14. https://doi.org/10.26906/EiR.2022.2(85).2623.

Al-Mamary Y. H. S. Understanding the use of learning management systems by undergraduate university students using the UTAUT model: credible evidence from Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights. 2022. Vol. 2. Is. 2. 100092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100092.

Акбаш К. С., Пасічник Н. О., Ріжняк Р. Я. Організація дослідницької діяльності майбутніх фахівців освітніх вимірювань. Наукові записки. Серія: Педагогічні науки. 2021. № 201. С. 54–61. https://doi.org/10.36550/2415-7988-2021-1-201-54-61.

Калініна Л. М., Топузов О. М., Лапінський В. В. Факторна модель для оцінки ефективності управління загальноосвітньою середньою школою та її практичне застосування. Інформаційні технології і засоби навчання. 2020. Т. 80. Вип. 6. С. 346–368. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v80i6.3912.

Dai Y., Liu A., Lim C. P. Reconceptualizing ChatGPT and generative AI as a student-driven innovation in higher education. Procedia CIRP. 2023. Vol. 119. Pp. 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.05.002.

Білик О. Моделі підвищення ефективності управління закладом освіти. Наукові праці Міжрегіональної академії управління персоналом. Політичні науки та публічне управління. 2022. № 2(62). С. 22–27. https://doi.org/10.32689/2523-4625-2022-2(62)-3.

Safonov Y., Shaposhnykov K., Berezhna T., Zaika T. et al. Factors of the competitiveness increase of higher education within the concept of the state’s sustainable development. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development. 2023. Vol. 45(1). Pp. 9–16. https://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2023.02.

References

TOPSIS Method for Multiple-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM). Available at: https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/topsis-method-for-multiple-criteria-decision-making-mcdm.

Gryshchenko, I., Ganushchak-Efimenko, L., Shcherbak, V., Nifatova, О., Zos-Kior, M., Hnatenko, I., Martynova, L., & Martynov, A. (2021). Making use of competitive advantages of a university education innovation cluster in the educational services market. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 10(2), 336–348. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2021.v10n2p336.

Prokopenko, O., Martyn, O., Bilyk, O., Vivcharuk, O., Zos-Kior, M., & Hnatenko, I. (2021). Models of state clusterisation management, marketing and labour market management in conditions of globalization, risk of bankruptcy and services market development. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 21(12), 228–234. https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2021.21.12.34.

Dolgikh, Ya. V. (2020). Evaluation and analysis of the efficiency of scientific personnel reproduction in higher education institutions in Ukraine using the DEA method. Ekonomika i Upravlinnya, 3, 118–126. https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2024-2-79-89.

Chernenko, O. (2024). Comparative analysis of models of quality management systems in higher education. Ukrainian Educational Journal, 2, 79–89. https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2024-2-79-89.

Grushetskyi, B. V., & Akimov, O. O. (2023). Implementation of public administration mechanisms for higher education development in Ukraine. Ekonomika, Upravlinnya ta Administruvannya, 3(105), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.26642/ema-2023-3(105)-103-109.

Samoylenko, O. V., Demchenko, N. M., & Filonenko, O. S. (2023). Features of the formation of an effective personnel policy in an educational institution. Research Notes. Series “Psychology and Pedagogy Research” (Nizhyn Mykola Gogol State University), 3, 110–118. https://doi.org/10.31654/2663-4902-2023-РР-3-110-118.

Popelo, O., Kholiavko, N., Safonov, Y., Shaposhnykov, K., Babukh, I., & Yamniuk, B. (2024). Global trends of universities digitalization under the sustainable development concept. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 46(4), 473–481. https://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2024.44.

Shaposhnykov, K., Shaposhnykova, I., Tanashchuk, K., Filippov, V., Hrytsku, V., & Demkiv, Yu. (2022). Competitiveness of higher education in the context of ensuring sustainable development of the state. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 44(3), 280–287. https://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2022.29.

Hanaysha, J. R., Shriedeh,F. B., & In’airat, M. (2023). Impact of classroom environment, teacher competency, information and communication technology resources, and university facilities on student engagement and academic performance. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 3(2), 100188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2023.100188.

Ostenda, A., Samoylenko, O., & Ivashov, Ye. (2022). Models for assessing the level of internationalization of higher education. Profesiyna Pedahohika, 1(24), 306–313. https://doi.org/10.32835/2707-3092.2022.24.306-313.

Marchuk, A. (2023). Quality of higher education in emergency conditions: educational losses and dysfunctions of digitalization and distance learning. Sotsialʹno-Ekonomichni Vidnosyny v Tsyfrovomu Suspilstvi, 1(47), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.55643/ser.1.47.2023.482.

Mykhailichenko, M., Lozhachevska, O., Smagin, V., Krasnoshtan, O., Zos-Kior, M., & Hnatenko, I. (2021). Competitive strategies of personnel management in business processes of agricultural enterprises focused on digitalization. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 43(3), 403–414. https://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2021.37.

Krupka, M. I., Hrynkevych, O. S., & Sas, S. P. (2021). Economic efficiency of universities in Ukraine in the context of innovative financial management. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 1(32), 470–481. https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v1i32.200659.

Chernenko, O. (2024). Comparative analysis of models of higher education quality management systems. Ukrainian Educational Journal, 2, 79–89. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7012-1797.

Tarasenko, O. (2024). Tools for assessing the effectiveness of the call in the strategic management system. Economy and Society, 64. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-64-86.

Chaudhry, I. S., Sarwary, S. A. M., El Refae, G. A., & Chabchoub, H. (2023). Time to revisit existing student’s performance evaluation approach in higher education sector in a new era of ChatGPT – A case study. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2210461. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2210461.

Gryshyna, Yu., & Pyzhova, M. (2022). Higher education institution management: searching for an effective model. Economics and Region, 2(85), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.26906/EiR.2022.2(85).2623.

Al-Mamary, Y. H. S. (2022). Understanding the use of learning management systems by undergraduate university students using the UTAUT model: credible evidence from Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 2(2), 100092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100092.

Akbash, K. S., Pasichnyk, N. O., & Rizhnyak, R. Ya. (2021). Organization of a research activity of the future specialists in educational measurements. Academic Notes. Series: Pedagogical Sciences, 201, 54–61. https://doi.org/10.36550/2415-7988-2021-1-201-54-61.

Kalinina, L. M., Topuzov, O. M., & Lapinskyi, V. V. (2020). Factor model for estimating efficiency of general secondary school managing and its practical application. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 80(6), 346–368. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v80i6.3912.

Dai, Y., Liu, A., & Lim, C. P. (2023). Reconceptualizing ChatGPT and generative AI as a student-driven innovation in higher education. Procedia CIRP, 119, 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.05.002.

Bilyk, O. (2022). Models for increasing the efficiency of educational institution management. Scientific Works of Interregional Academy of Personnel Management. Political Sciences and Public Management, 2(62), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.32689/2523-4625-2022-2(62)-3.

Safonov, Y., Shaposhnykov, K., Berezhna, T., Zaika, T., Tarangul, L., & Kramarenko, I. (2023). Factors of competitiveness increase of higher education within the concept of the state’s sustainable development. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 45(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2023.02.

Assessment of the efficiency of management models in higher education institutions

Authors

DOI:

Keywords:

Abstract

References

Downloads

Published

How to Cite

Issue

Section

License

Similar Articles